. Possibility of Major Changes in Sight for U.S. Labor Laws | LAW Professor.com - Your Self Help Guide For Legal Advice - Hostgator Coupons 2015: Hostgator offers 2015 :- Now hostagtor hosting offers and get plans 2015 Hostgator Coupon 2015 . Now Hostgator Plan to provide coupons on 2015.

LawProfessor.com Exclusive Article

Possibility of Major Changes in Sight for U.S. Labor Laws

More Options:

Print This Article Print This Article
Email This Article Email This Article


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo
LawProfessor.com Exclusive

The issue of unfairly low wages for women workers is certainly not a new issue in the United States (and indeed in the rest of the world). This year there was a case that hit the U.S. Supreme Court with regard to this issue once more.

Goodyear was accused of discrimination of a female employee because her wages were lower than those of her male co-workers. This is not a new scenario by any means and unfortunately, due to the complicated ins and outs of the U.S. legal system, no relief was found for the plaintiff in this case.

The court decision here focused on the timing of the issue. Way back in 1964, the Civil Rights Act addressed such matters as discriminatory pay. It said however that a plaintiff must file charges within 180 days of a decision that showed discrimination. The woman in this year’s case had already been employed by Goodyear for quite some time and so, the 180 day limit was in effect.

Even though it was argued that the decision by Goodyear each and every payday to pay this woman less than her male counterparts was a new “discriminatory decision”, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that it was not so.

This case illuminates the sorely overdue need for changes to U.S. labor laws that continue to allow for discrimination to occur in the workplace. Women’s groups and equal rights activists have been highlighting these examples for years and years but the fact remains that we still indeed live in a country that believes it is okay to pay one worker less for the exact same work than another worker.

Labor laws and equal rights issues such as these will continue to be challenged on the legal level in any way that plaintiffs and activists can find in order to keep the matters in view of the American people. Most people know that it is completely unfair to pay workers differently based on their sex, their race or other factor that does not affect their work.

Because of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, many labor issues were addressed and changed over the years since. While many remain unfinished and still in the process of moving ahead (such as this Goodyear case) some 43 years after they were addressed by this Act, the United States Supreme Court will be forced to deal with every aspect of each and every challenge until such discrimination is once and for all wiped from our landscape.

While the U.S. legal system is continually bogged down by personal injury suits and frivolous claims for millions of dollars for a pair of dry cleaned pants, major issues such as equal pay for equal work remain as unfinished business. There are major changes on the horizon in labor law within the United States. The question is, how far away is that horizon?

More Special offers:
Student Loans | Legal Forms | Student Credit Cards | Low Interest Credit Cards
Most Recent Article Additions to LawProfessor.com:

Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this Web site LawProfessor.com is provided as a service, and does not constitute legal advice or establish an attorney client relationship. LawProfessor.com makes no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this web site feature and its associated sites. Nothing provided herein should be used as a substitute for the advice of your own counsel.
Privacy Policy | Impulse Tickets.com | LetsGetCredit.com
Copyright © 2007-2011 Lawprofessor.com a subsidiary of Boxing Inisder LLC. All rights Reserved